Lords examine new amendment to data bill to require AI firms declare use of copyrighted content

Q: How long will it take to read this news story?

The story "Lords examine new amendment to data bill to require AI firms declare use of copyrighted content" has 1320 words across 16 sentences, which will take approximately 6 - 11 minutes for the average person to read.

Q: Which news outlet covered this story?

The story "Lords examine new amendment to data bill to require AI firms declare use of copyrighted content" was covered 1 days ago by The Guardian, a news publisher based in United Kingdom.

Q: How trustworthy is 'The Guardian' news outlet?

The Guardian is a fully independent (privately-owned) news outlet established in 1821 that covers mostly artificial-intelligence and technology news. The outlet is headquartered in United Kingdom and publishes an average of 2 news stories per day. It's most recent story was published 10 hours ago.

Q: What do people currently think of this news story?

The sentiment for this story is currently Neutral, indicating that people are not responding positively or negatively to this news.

Q: How do I report this news for inaccuracy?

You can report an inaccurate news publication to us via our contact page. Please also include the news #ID number and the URL to this story.<ul><li>News ID: #28735024</li><li>URL: https://goldengate-staging18.beamstart.com/news/lords-examine-new-amendment-to-17473450021687</li></ul>

The Guardian 1d ago

Lords examine new amendment to data bill to require AI firms declare use of copyrighted content - The Guardian

Quick Summary:

It circumvents financial privilege grounds on which earlier version was rejected by MPs on WednesdayA new amendment to the data bill that would require artificial intelligence companies to disclose their use of copyright-protected content has been tabled, after MPs voted to remove an earlier version on Wednesday.

The amendment by the cross-bench peer and former film director Beeban Kidron will be a fresh challenge to plans to let artificial intelligence firms use copyright-protected work without permission.Continue reading...

The new wording states the government “may” make enforcement provisions rather than “must”, and gives no detail about how the government could enforce them.